Wednesday, December 19, 2018

CARI Revisits China, Djibouti, and the New York Times: How Much Debt?

We are reposting our analysis of Djibouti's debt to China, in view of the launch of the Trump administration's new Africa strategy last week.

Once again, the administration described Chinese lending as predatory: "the strategic use of debt to hold states in Africa captive to Beijing’s wishes and demands." No evidence was provided for this characterization of Chinese lending.

As with the administration's overblown estimates of Chinese lending in Djibouti (discussed below), we urge reporters to do their own reporting on China-Africa debt issues, and not to simply report the administration's "facts" at face value.

Our post from 2017 follows:

The New York Times had a front page article on China and Djibouti this past weekend: "U.S. Wary of its New Neighbor in Djibouti -- a Chinese Naval Base." Like many observers, the NYT seems to have been misled about the scale of Chinese engagement, and Chinese lending to Djibouti in particular. Here's what they said:
Beyond surveillance concerns, United States officials, citing the billions of dollars in Chinese loans to Djibouti’s heavily indebted government, wonder about the long-term durability of an alliance that has served Washington well in its global fight against Islamic extremism.
Here at the China Africa Research Initiative we specialize in tracking and confirming Chinese loans in Africa. We have not been contacted by the US government, and we wonder where they are getting their "data"? In this instance, we were able to interview top ranking officials in Djibouti's Ministry of Finance to confirm Chinese loan financing.

Signed Loans/Debts Owed by Djibouti to Chinese Government (past decade). All in US$

1. Goubet/Ghoubet Salt Port Expansion:                                    64 million
2. Addis-Djibouti Railway (Djibouti share):                             492 million
3. Djibouti-Ethiopia Water Pipeline:                                         322 million
4. Doraleh Container Terminal/Multipurpose
Port Expansion (the endpoint of the Ethiopia-Djibouti Railway)
and Damerjog Livestock Export Port:                                        405 million

TOTAL                                                                                      $1283 million, or $1.3 billion

We also have a confirmed report of $596 million in Chinese finance for two new airports, but this appears to be either a Chinese company suppliers' credit or a public-private partnership investment, not a Chinese government loan. However, even if we add this, the total comes to $1.9 billion. While several other projects--most prominently a toll road highway to the border--have been in the news, we confirmed that they are all still under discussion. Yes, $1.3 billion or even $1.9 billion is a large figure, but it seems inaccurate to call it "billions of dollars in Chinese loans".

Undue alarmism? Another case of "alternative facts"? More reason to support an increase of $58 billion in the US defense budget? From what we can see, China's main rival in Djibouti has not been the US, but Dubai Ports World, which had a number of public-private partnership (PPP) port contracts in Djibouti, and had also arranged financing to build and operate ports in this important gateway to land-locked Ethiopia, one of Africa's most populous and dynamic countries.

As always, if someone has better information, please comment here or contact us directly at SAIS-CARI at Johns Hopkins University.

4 comments:

Unknown said...

I read the article and was struck by the claim as well. In my view, it is a good example of sloppy journalism. The journalism needed a source and instead of doing some digging to get the facts he asked (lets hope) some government official who then just made some stuff up!

Pedro Carrico said...

Well, maybe it was just an unfortunate use of the plural for shock value. Considering Djibouti's external debt doubled in 3 years and is approaching 100% of GDP, there is plenty of reason to worry even with a single billion. From the look of it Chinese financing was responsible for this increase. Had this questionably "irresponsible" lending been offered by another country, would it have been deemed worrisome by the NYT's source? The strategic value of Djibouti to the US and its allies never really depended on the country's economic stability in the past. So one has to conclude that it's all about rivalry over access to and influence over one of the most important geostrategic spots on the planet.

Anonymous said...

Profitant de notre position géostratégique, notre pays est devenu ainsi un acteur incontournable de la politique Chine-Afrique.
En tant que jeune djiboutien, je rend hommage à la Chine qui a investit énormément des projets marathon de transformation de l'économie de Djibouti.
L'histoire retiendra ainsi la politique visionnaire du président IOG et cette détermination sans faille de rendre Djibouti le petit Dubaï de la Corne d'Afrique.
Djama ALI houssein (société civile Assajog )

Noticias de angola said...

The strategic value of Djibouti to the US and its allies never really depended on the country's economic stability in the past. So one has to conclude that it's all about rivalry over access to and influence over one of the most important geostrategic spots on the planet https://www.informativoangolano.com